Appeal against HoneyBee, Chilufya acquittal to proceed

However, the bench dismissed the application after determining that the delay was not attributable to the DPP.

The court noted that a related legal challenge concerning an extension of time to appeal had to be resolved first, and the expiration of standard timelines did not strip the court of its jurisdiction.

Addressing procedural technicalities raised by the defence, the judges ruled that filing the initial Notice of Appeal in the Subordinate Court Registry – rather than the High Court Registry – fully complied with Section 323 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The court emphasised that the legal duty to transmit the completed Record of Appeal to the High Court rests with the Subordinate Court registry, not the appellant.

“Based on the foregoing reasons, we find that the application by the respondents to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution lacks merit and is dismissed accordingly,” Justice Mabbolobbolo stated.

The DPP is appealing the January 26, 2021 acquittal of Dr Chilufya and eight others across six criminal counts stemming from the controversial HoneyBee medical procurement scandal.

Alongside HoneyBee and its directors, the respondents include former Ministry of Health Permanent Secretary Kakulubelwa Mulalelo, Wilson Lungu and Bonaventure Chilinde.

The underlying charges involve alleged wilful failure to comply with statutory procurement procedures, unlawful acts causing harm, obtaining a pharmaceutical licence without meeting legal requirements, dealing in substandard or misbranded medicines, forgery, and uttering false documents.

DPP Gilbert Phiri contends that the trial court committed a fundamental error by acquitting the respondents before formal pleas were taken on all six counts and without satisfying mandatory legal prerequisites, such as obtaining the direct consent of the DPP to prosecute. https://enews.daily-mail.co.zm/welcome/home